2018/11/02: A new free website spearheaded by the Library Innovation Lab at the Harvard Law School makes available nearly 6.5 million state and federal cases dating from the 1600s to earlier this year, in an initiative that could alter and inform the future availability of similar areas of public-sector big data.
Led by the Lab, which was founded in 2010 as an arena for experimentation and exploration into expanding the role of libraries in the online era, the Caselaw Access Project went live Oct. 29 after five years of discussions, planning and digitization of roughly 100,000 pages per day over two years.
The effort was inspired by the Google Books Project; the Free Law Project, a California 501(c)(3) that provides free, public online access to primary legal sources, including so-called “slip opinions,” or early but nearly final versions of legal opinions; and the Legal Information Institute, a nonprofit service of Cornell University that provides free online access to key legal materials.
The conversion, done in-house at the Harvard Law School Library to preserve the chain of custody of millions of cases it had collected, used a hydraulic cutter to trim the binding from thousands of volumes; and a machine similar to those employed in the meatpacking industry to vacuum-seal them after scanning. Scanning costs were in the millions of dollars. Scanned, resealed volumes were shipped out-of-state for long-term storage underground at a former limestone mine in Louisville, Ky. Pages were subsequently uploaded to an optical character recognition (OCR) vendor for extraction into text files.
The project, which was funded by venture capital-backed startup Ravel Law and the Harvard Law School, doesn’t aggregate every court battle. Its legal trove primarily focuses on supreme court and appellate decisions, but is limited, the Lab’s director said, by the extent to which bygone officials “cared enough at the time” to compile decisions. Director Adam Ziegler said the project has a high concentration of federal trial opinions and lots of trial opinions from the state of New York, an early legal center, but fewer from some other states.
In standing up the project website, Ziegler said the Lab hopes to provide “anyone and everyone” with easy access to the law via court opinions, but noted that concept will have different meanings to different groups and “definitely means things we don’t even envision ourselves.”
Aurecon will be the first company in Australia to use a visual employment contract, creating a succinct and meaningful visual contract that uses illustrations to complement the text.
Ethereum is a decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.
The twin technologies of cryptocurrencies and cryptocontracts are going to turn contract law into a programming language". Excerpted from @ThoughtInfected: "Essentially what we are talking about is a real democratization of contractual agreements. Whereas today contracts are restricted to deals with enough value to justify a lawyers time (mortgages, business deals, land transfer etc ), in... Continue reading ...
Facebook girl doesn't know what 'confidentiality' means.
Amanda Knox has faced three verdicts in six years over a case in which it was alleged she was part of a brutal knife attack on Meredeth Kercher in Perugia in 2007 that resulted in her death. Although Knox
Many don't understand why they should be concerned about surveillance if they have nothing to hide. It's even less clear in the world of 'oblique' surveillance, given that apologists will always frame our use of information-gathering services like a mobile phone plan or Gmail as a choice. if everyone's every action were being monitored, and everyone technically violates some obscure law at some time, then punishment becomes purely selective.
Legislation is difficult to read and understand. So difficult that it largely goes unread. This is something I learned when I first started building bill drafting systems over a decade ago. It was quite a let down. The people you would expect to read legislation don't actually do that. Instead they must rely on analyses,
Law is always going to be playing catch up to technology", says senior UK data protection lawyer, as Britain negotiates new EU data protection regulations
Prosecutors can obtain Facebook data more easily than defense attorneys, thanks to the federal Stored Communications Act.
Lawyers' use of web-based software and services has grown only slightly in recent years, a new survey indicates. Growth in use of the cloud is greatest amo
Magistrates say they should be able to use new online crime maps to give tougher sentences for offenders who are blighting a neighbourhood.
2006/06/01: Bangladesh has failed to progress towards achieving its target as envisaged in its information technology (IT) policy documentations. The inability of the national parliament to enact an IT law is primarily considered responsible for such a failure. This paper initially attempts to identify issues relevant to the use of information and communication technology (ICT) and e-government in Bangladesh. It is followed by a discussion on the legal aspects of the use of ICT in e-government activities and the country’s failure to enact the draft IT Act for more than four years. Subsequently, a framework of e-government and legal protection is introduced and major ICT related legal issues discussed with references to the draft IT Act of Bangladesh and other relevant legal codes